Have We Begun Building Our Institutions from Where Others Left Off?
The article examines the gap between official rhetoric and practice in Palestinian public institutions, drawing on findings and recommendations of the State Audit and Administrative Control Bureau (SAACB). It highlights issues of accountability, nepotism, and repeated administrative failures.
العربيةRead the Arabic original
English translation, prepared and reviewed before publication. The Arabic text is authoritative.
- Published
- Reading time
- 5 min read

· The title of our article today summarizes the story of a homeland that still lives with a gap between words and deeds, between dream and reality, awaiting to truly begin from where others finished, not to repeat its beginnings every time!
· First of all... let it be known that a reader of the reports of the State Audit and Administrative Control Bureau (SAACB) in Palestine, and of its observations and recommendations, is certain that there are some centers of responsibility and their administrative structures in public work that contravene the laws and regulations that govern and organize the work of these centers, either through laxity and negligence in performing their responsibilities, or through feigned ignorance in exercising responsibility, one tool of which is silence about the violations occurring in the directorate, or the authority, or the ministry, or the public institution; an example of that is some administrative control units scattered in every corner of centers of responsibility in the public sector..!.. But this does not mean that all centers of responsibility including their administrative structures are in violation!.. for there are those that work, monitor, and carry out their responsibilities in the fullest manner!
· Have we truly begun to build our institutions from where others finished?... This question we have long repeated, and we have heard its answer from the owners of white collars, or boasted about it before the public when we are entrusted with the responsibility of founding a directorate or launching a new project. The phrase condenses the work of predecessors, their expertise, their experiences, and what they achieved over many years, yet repeating it to people did not grant it credibility.... when we return to reality after the passage of years, we find that the facts say the opposite of what we repeat!
· Work here sometimes proceeds from where others began, not from where they finished! We have not yet learned from the mistakes of those who preceded us, nor from their correct experiences that could have been a guiding beacon for us; we did not make good use of what was right to emulate it, nor of what was wrong to overcome it, but remained captive to traditional patterns of thought and habits of routine and social hypocrisy! The phrase condenses the experiences of those who preceded us and summarizes their effort in a passing sentence, as if we are a people condemned to re-invent the wheel every time, without learning from our falls or from our moments of success!
· We still believe, for example, that a cup of coffee can solve part of our problems, and we repeat with naive faith that “so-and-so’s position” will solve the knot, as long as his father had prestige and power! So we expect good from the incoming official, not because of his competence, but because of what his name, lineage, or companions symbolize!
· When we compare this reality of ours with countries that believe in genuine democracy and practice it in word and deed, where the office is seen as a mandate to serve the people, not an honor for the self, and every official is held accountable no matter how high his rank, those countries were not built by compliments or flowery words, but by institutional accumulation and the belief that correcting an error is nobler than denying it.
· As for democracy here, the official swears it is the society’s tent and that he prides himself on it before the mightiest nations! Hypocrisy in our institutions is abundant, false praise more so, and the employee who exaggerates in glorifying his boss does so out of a desire for security, not out of love for excellence!
· “Have we really begun to build our homeland from where others finished?” — a question that exposes a sick reality that reproduces itself generation after generation!... Our society still revolves in a closed circle of mistakes and repetition, where notions of prestige, tribalism, and regionalism prevail at the expense of competence, justice, and transparency, and personal relations, “cups of coffee,” and mediations remain the keys to influence and decision-making. These phenomena have entrenched administrative corruption and social hypocrisy and pushed the homeland away from the shore of safety, while the ordinary citizen remains the permanent victim of this structural malfunction!
· There is a paradox between the official discourse and actual practice: the official talks about the dignity of the citizen and the justice of the system, while reality reveals the restriction and suppression of freedoms, the monopolization of opportunities, and the exploitation of positions. Democracy—as they describe it—manifests in slogans raised for boasting rather than for application, where praise and hypocrisy become means of survival rather than a culture of work and excellence.
· It has been said before: If we do not correct the mistake in acknowledgement we will repeat the mistake in a new form
Share or cite
Zuhdi Shubeitah, “Have We Begun Building Our Institutions from Where Others Left Off?” (English translation of «هل حقيقة اننا بدانا في بناء مؤسساتنا .. من حيث انتهى الاخرون..!», originally published 28 October 2025), https://www.zuhdish.co/en/articles/have-we-begun-building-our-institutions-from-where
Where this article sits in “Oversight & Accountability”
All articles (221) →Article 189 of 221 in this topic of the archive, since 2022.