The Arab Crisis and Their Future
An analysis of a 7 December 1995 lecture by the late Heikal that examines Arab political choices since 1973, comparing “Vichy-like” accommodation and “Gaullist” resistance, and assessing the effects of Madrid, Oslo, economic normalization and debates over Jerusalem.
العربيةRead the Arabic original
English translation, prepared and reviewed before publication. The Arabic text is authoritative.
- Published
- Reading time
- 6 min read

In a lecture delivered by the late
Heikal in Paris on 7-12-1995...and about 24 years ago, he spoke before a large audience of
notables interested in general Arab affairs in the French capital Paris..and the substance
of his lecture delivered on that date...the echoes of it and the late Heikal’s
views on the general Arab situation and its future...still reverberate.
The great writer and journalist
Heikal pointed at the start of his lecture in Paris that when Nazi Germany occupied
France in 1940 in the World War, voices rose advocating submission
to the factual reality of the occupying Nazi force...where the “Vichy government” led by “General
Pétain” was the first to call for and rule according to the notion that reality imposes
its judgments, “that realism is more likely to be safe than stubbornness” — this was the general
view held by the “Vichy government,” and its submission to the factual reality of the
occupying forces in that period!!...and the Vichy government cooperated with the Nazi
occupation at that time, and some French people rallied around it, justifying acceptance
of the reality to preserve what remained, while the majority of the French saw it as a
great betrayal..until President Charles de Gaulle came resisting..afterwards hiding in Britain
and Algeria and led the clandestine resistance then and succeeded in liberating his
country France..in cooperation with the Allies in World War II...!
In his lecture the late Heikal
compared the “French Vichyists”..then and the “Arab Vichyists” among the rulers from
after the October 1973 war to the present day...saying (the actual and practical Arab reality
has become “Vichy-like” in its features and traits..but the official and media Arab
rhetoric decided to be “Gaullist” in rhythm and tones)..!! It was a process intended to
multiply illusions and dreams....and forces emerged in the Arab world defending the
status quo in favor of those forces within it.!!
And it is logical in
such circumstances that “opportunity-seeking groups meet with the local and regional
political administrative elites and with international demands..” and a relationship of
common interests arises among them which seemed hurried in its purpose, so it supported
its influence and expanded its opportunity, and this “led to a kind of corruption in the
Arab world of an unprecedented form”..!!
The late “Heikal” added in his
lecture: that an authority that wants to remain without burdening itself with "the
cause of legitimacy"...has no way but "to remain by force in its positions"..and these
groups of common interest showed that the Arab nation faced a coercive choice, meaning
that those who object to the status quo, including the unbalanced peace with Israel,
"have no option but to face a dark future under the rule of religious extremism"...
Civil war occurred in
Lebanon and lasted decades, and the war in Afghanistan drew in Arab citizens who were
called (the mujahidin) to Afghanistan..to fight!! against the Soviets at that time and
were supported by America and its allies from the Arab world..and Iraq was destroyed!! ...All
these forces that did what they did in Arab countries created an on-the-ground alliance
between Arabs and Israel...and the Arabs went to the Madrid Conference... whether they
were in the front row or the back row.."they were united with Israel in one framework
in one form"!!! giving the whole world the impression that peace had arrived..nothing
remained of it except signatures and seals!!
He asked participants at the
Madrid Conference to distinguish between two types of peace...: “a ‘political peace’ that is
related to history and its legacies and lifting these legacies requires time!!..and an
‘economic peace’ related to the future and its requirements and to obtaining its rewards rapidly!!”
He also lifted the veil on a new scene in the corridors of the Madrid peace conference, which was
the birth of a “new order for the Middle East.”..and that for its establishment it was
necessary that certain elements be present!..among them “an element of interests”..at
least not conflicting!! “and an element of security”..at least not colliding!! “and an
element of culture” if not shared..then at least connected!!
Despite that, the Arabs were
ready to rush down the post-Madrid paths...and they began to accept the principle of
separating an accelerated “economic peace”!! and a slower “political
peace”!!
And because they rushed to “economic peace,” movement on “political peace” was
hampered..which caused some Arabs to pause there, and the Arab arena became full of
doubt and confusion..for the Israeli role was not only “a dominant role” but also “a
contractor role” in these conferences and in the region..when economic summit conferences
(Davos) began to be held regularly..as for the Arab side, some of its circles were flooded
with the tone of unconditional normalization on the premise that the present time is “the
age of prevailing interests” and that political problems are “the baggage of a past
era”..!! Supporters of normalization were prepared to go along with Peres, the champion of the idea
of a new Middle East..and prepared to look the other way on any political issue even if it
was Jerusalem..!! and they removed “Jerusalem” from the agendas of economic summit
conferences..indeed the matter grew more bitter when Rabin – Prime Minister of Israel at the
time, said at the economic summit in Amman in 1995 to those present at the conference
"I come from Jerusalem, the united eternal capital of Israel" and Shimon Beitaz added
in completion: ".the issue of Jerusalem is not open to any discussion today or tomorrow"
while the U.S. Congress in that year had approved a law to move the U.S. embassy in
Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem...!!
Arab conditions then became more
tragic when the Palestinian issue shifted to “Oslo”...and the late Heikal likened this Arab
and Palestinian race to what the great late poet Mahmoud Darwish called the condition of the
Arab nation the slogan “the suicide of meaning,” as the Palestinian issue’s transfer to
Oslo..led to Israel obtaining a legal legitimacy of its existence that it had not had since
1948..for the matter in Madrid had been related to the role of Israel in the region and the
transition from one era to another..!!
How like today to yesterday
...24 years ago.....and what the late “Heikal” spoke of is happening in some of its details
and terms today!!...for economic peace and normalization and Israel’s entry into the
new Middle East “as a security contractor” and its absolution from the charge of
terrorism...are what the Arabs implemented from the Madrid Conference...and Jerusalem
was declared the capital of Israel..and the U.S. embassy was moved from Tel Aviv..to
Jerusalem...without storms..and without real Arab anger...and the Golan was transferred
to Israel...the Arabs denounced the moves..denounced them bitterly....and they continued
to treat their wounds here and there..and Israel began its overt role..linking the arms
of Arab officials...to appear in intimate public relations..without fear or trembling. A
new enemy for the Arabs was invented, considered the greatest danger to the Arabs and to
their neighbors...and Israel began to fight together and alongside some Arabs under the
term “terrorism.” And Israel seized most of the remaining Palestinian land quietly, cunningly and by
exploiting opportunities..and the Palestinians froze in place..failing to stop the
settlement expansion...which extended significantly in the past twenty-five years!! and the
Palestinians acknowledged mistakes in the negotiations especially regarding settlements,
while the Israelis insisted on calling the West Bank “the areas” or “Judaea and
Samaria” until the U.S. administration through its ambassador in Tel Aviv stated that the
term “occupied territories” is not to be used for the Palestinian territories after 1967
but rather “disputed territories” and some Arab regimes tightened the screws on the
Palestinians in an unprecedented way to force them to carry out a deal whose lines were
not seen, but some of its clauses were passed..which is the “Deal of the Century.” Internal
fighting continued to bleed in many Arab countries..until every Arab state became trying to
care for itself...with the help of external powers ..!!...Corruption spread throughout the Arab world..and
discord arose among some Arab countries..between them..until the Arab League..could do
nothing except endorse decisions and visions dictated by Arab alliances..against other
Arab states..!!
Mr. Heikal pointed out in
his aforementioned long lecture that the future belongs to the Arab nation.!!..and that
change and the re-scripting of the nation’s future can be achieved generation after
generation by two basic means: “education and legislation” and that the nation feels despite
its wounds that “the future is born in the hearts of the people and from their hearts to
their minds and from their minds to their will.”..So the late Heikal’s state of mind says:
that the Arab will remains...and will triumph..but by changing the pattern of thinking and
by enacting laws and systems that protect people’s rights, freedoms and creativity,
and respecting their minds and thinking, equality and spreading democracy.
Share or cite
Zuhdi Shubeitah, “The Arab Crisis and Their Future” (English translation of «أزمة العرب ومستقبلهم», originally published 15 September 2022), https://www.zuhdish.co/en/articles/the-arab-crisis-and-their-future
Where this article sits in “Public Affairs & Politics”
All articles (316) →Article 92 of 316 in this topic of the archive, since 2022.